Legal Opinion
Laufer v. Conservation Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 4, 1991No. 9456PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the action of the defendant Fairfield conservation commission1 denying his application for permission to construct a stream crossing within a wetland and watercourse area. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff claims that the judgment is fatally flawed because the trial court failed to find (1) that the *710commission abused its discretion when it failed to apply its own standards in denying the plaintiffs application, (2) that the denial of the plaintiffs application was clearly erroneous in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Jaffe v. State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Brecciaroli v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pelliccione v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Bethlehem Christian Fellowship, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Levy v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Carr v. Cons. Inland Wtlds. Com., No. Cv 97007340 (Feb. 9, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- City of Bridgeport v. Bridgeport Police, No. Cv 93 0307435 S (Jan. 4, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.