Legal Opinion

Marshall v. DelPonte

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 14, 1992No. 10302PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

The defendant, the commissioner of motor vehicles for the state of Connecticut, appeals from the trial court’s judgment sustaining the plaintiff Lawrence Marshall’s appeal from the defendant’s order suspending Marshall’s driver’s license for ninety days pursuant to General Statutes § 14-227b. The defendant claims that the trial court incorrectly concluded that the department of motor vehicles failed, at the license suspension hearing, to present evidence sufficient to prove that the plaintiffs blood-alcohol content (BAC) was equal to or greater than 0.1 percent by weight at the time of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Persico v. MaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. State v. GeislerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Martone v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Altholtz v. Connecticut Dental CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  3. O'Rourke v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. State v. GraciaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. Coble v. MaloneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API