Legal Opinion

Nilsson v. State Personnel Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1939No. Civ. 6253PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

Heretofore petitioner, a civil service employee, had been reinstated in the department of agriculture (Nilsson v. State Personnel Board, 25 Cal. App. (2d) 699 [78 Pac. (2d) 467]), and in accordance with the judgment therein rendered, had been paid all salary to which he was entitled. Respondents, however, refused to pay to petitioner any interest upon the unpaid back salary, and upon presenting the matter to the superior court, a peremptory writ of mandate was issued requiring and directing the payment of such interest. From that order this appeal is taken.

The sole question for consideration…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Nilsson v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Howe v. SouthreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. McPherson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Los Angeles Rock & Gravel Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mass v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. De Echeguren v. De EchegurenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Jorgensen v. CranstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Gibbons & Reed Co. v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Sullivan v. WellbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API