Sheehan v. Board of Police Commissioners
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco directing the issuance of a Writ of Mandate and from an order denying a •motion to vacate an order directing the issuance of a Writ of Mandate. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. George Lull, City Attorney, and Charles S. Peery, Assistant City Attorney, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The proceedings out of which the present appeal arose had their inception in two certain special proceedings instituted by the respondent herein in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco against the board of police commissioners of said municipality, by which, in the first of said proceedings, he sought by a writ of review to have certain orders of said board, wherein he was attempted to be dismissed from the police department thereof, reviewed and annulled; and by the second of which proceedings he sought by writ of mandate to compel his restoration and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Spencer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Engebretson v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Barber v. MulfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Sheehan v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mass v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Jorgensen v. CranstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Gibbons & Reed Co. v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.