De Echeguren v. De Echeguren
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, J.—
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendants Mercedes de Echeguren Miller and Paul Albert Miller entered upon-an order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For convenience we will refer to the defendants by their first names.
Plaintiff’s first amended complaint sets forth two separately stated causes of action. In the first, the complaint alleges that plaintiff and Mercedes were married in Spain in 1952, at all times thereafter have been husband and wife and have two children born issue of such marriage; that Mercedes without provocation, cause or…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Baldwin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.