Sullivan v. Wellborn
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
The litigation culminating in the present controversy was commenced in 1939 by an action in which defendant and cross-complainant here, Nada Truscott Well-born, obtained a judgment annuling her marriage to Charles Wellborn, hereinafter referred to as first action. In that judgment defendant was declared to be the owner of certain real property but that Charles Wellborn “has a lien” on the property in the sum of $1,250. No personal judgment was rendered against defendant for said $1,250 and no provision ivas made for execution or enforcement of the lien. Thereafter, upon motion of Mr. Wellborn…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Mahoney v. BostwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Estate of LockhartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Childs Real Estate Co. v. Shelburne Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Furlong v. CooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Redke v. SilvertrustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Psm Holding Corp. v. National Farm Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Floridians Against Casino Takeover v. LET'S HELP FLSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Jones v. Sacramento Sav. & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.