Burgess v. Rodom
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for breach of contract to purchase real property. The demurrer of the defendant-vendee, Jane E. Rodom, to plaintiff’s second amended complaint was sustained. Plaintiff declined to amend further. Judgment was accordingly entered that plaintiff take nothing. It is from this judgment that plaintiff appeals.
The agreement upon which the seller predicates his right of action acknowledges receipt of $200 as a deposit on the purchase price of the property and provides that “The balance of the purchase price [$5,000.] is to be paid within 30 days from date hereof, as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Autry v. Republic Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Body-Steffner Co. v. Flotill Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Dillingham v. DahlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Wineburgh v. GayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Laks v. Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Roberts v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Alaska Creamery Products, Inc. v. WellsAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Burrow v. TimmsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Hutton v. GliksbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.