Legal Opinion
Hutton v. Gliksberg
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 27, 1982No. Civ. 60041PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, J.
Plaintiffs Brian G. Hutton and Albert S. Ruddy (hereinafter Buyers) brought this action against defendants Mike and Sheina Gliksberg (hereinafter Sellers) to compel specific performance of a contract for the purchase and sale of real property. The trial court granted a judgment in favor of Buyers, compelling Sellers to convey the property and awarding incidental compensation. Sellers appeal.
On March 3, 1977, the parties executed a written contract for the purchase and sale of an apartment building at 426-428 Spaulding Drive in Beverly Hills, California, for $750,000. They…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Meyer v. BenkoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Regan v. LanzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ekberg v. SharpWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Smith v. State Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Williams v. Collins Communications, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Rusiski v. PribonicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Real Estate Analytics, LLC v. VallasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.