Legal Opinion
Natural Resources Defense Council v. Fish & Game Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 1994No. C014827PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, Acting P. J.
In this appeal, we interpret a procedural provision in the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). (Fish & G. Code, § 2050 et seq.; all further references to undesignated code sections will be to the Fish and Game Code unless otherwise specified.) That provision guides the Fish and Game Commission (Commission) in determining whether to list a species as a candidate for “endangered” or “threatened” classification, and requires the Commission to find “that the petition [requesting endangered or threatened listing] provides sufficient information to indicate that the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- California Forestry Ass'n v. California Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Center for Biological Diversity v. California Fish and Game CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.