Legal Opinion
Center for Biological Diversity v. Fish & Game Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 2, 2008No. C055059PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
In this case we decide that California’s Fish and Game Commission (the Commission) erred in rejecting at the threshold a petition to add the California tiger salamander 1 to the Commission’s list of endangered species, under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA; Fish & G. Code, § 2050 et seq.). 2 Under CESA a petition for listing must be accepted for consideration if it is supported by sufficient information to lead a reasonable person to conclude there is a substantial possibility the requested listing could occur. (§ 2074.2; Natural Resources Defense Council v. Fish &…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Sacramento v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Tripp v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Westside Community for Independent Living, Inc. v. ObledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cent. Coast Forest Ass'n v. Fish & Game Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Central Coast Forest Assn. v. Fish & Game Com.California Court of Appeal · 2018
- Yazam v. D.C. Department of For-Hire VehiclesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024