Legal Opinion

California Forestry Ass'n v. California Fish & Game Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 2007No. C053866PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROME, J.

California has been at the forefront of enacting legislation to protect endangered and rare animals—first doing so in 1970. (Natural Resources Defense Council v. Fish & Game Com. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 1104, 1111 [33 Cal.Rptr.2d 904].) Fourteen years later, that legislation was repealed and replaced with the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) (Fish & G. Code, 1 § 2050 et seq.). (Natural Resources Defense Council, at p. 1111.)

In enacting the CESA, the Legislature made clear this state’s policy to protect any endangered or threatened “species or subspecies” if at risk of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Western Oil & Gas Ass'n v. Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Defenders of Wildlife v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Corenbaum v. LampkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Sims v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. WATERSHED ENFORCERS v. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. People v. RoscoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API