Legal Opinion
Connecticut v. Doehr
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 6, 1991No. 90-143PublishedCited by 457 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
delivered an opinion, Parts of which are the opinion of the Court.†
This case requires us to determine whether a state statute that authorizes prejudgment attachment of real estate without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the person seeking the attachment post a bond, satisfies the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. We hold that, as applied to this case, it does not.
*5t — I
On March 15, 1988, petitioner John F. DiGiovanni submitted an application to the Connecticut Superior Court for an attachment in the amount…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by457 opinions
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron RoeillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
452 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.