State v. Grimes
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for attempted unlawful sexual penetration in the first degree. ORS 163.411. His principal contention is that the trial court erred in applying ORS 137.750 to prevent him from being eligible for good-time sentence reduction. According to defendant, because ORS 137.750 was not enacted until after he committed his crime, application of the statute to his case violates state and federal prohibitions against ex post facto laws. We conclude that the application of ORS 137.750 to this case does not violate either state or federal ex post facto clauses and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. WilleOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. CookmanOregon Supreme Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. WorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Herbst v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. JaehnigCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.