State v. Carter
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEbviN, J.
Tbe rules regulating practice in tbe Supreme Court prescribe that “exceptions in tbe record not set out in appellant’s brief, or in support of wbicb no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, • will be taken as abandoned by bim.” Eule 28. Tbe defendant bas thus relinquished all of bis exceptions save those numbered 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 13.
These particular exceptions are addressed to comments or remarks made by tbe presiding judge in tbe presence of tbe jury during tbe progress of tbe trial. Tbe defendant asserts with much earnestness that tbe language of tbe judge disparaged his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.