State v. Simpson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The defendant is well advised in abandoning his demurrer to the sufficiency of the evidence to carry the case to the jury. The prosecuting witness was direct and positive in his testimony. Its probative value was for the twelve. S. v. Hovis, ante, 359.
A new trial must be granted, however, because of the impeachment and depreciation by the court of the defendant’s evidence and that of his witnesses, Green and Hurlocker. This was done, first, by ordering the defendant and his two witnesses into custody during the trial, which action by the court came to the attention of the jury trying the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Withers v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- State v. . StiwinterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- State v. . OwnbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Speed v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.