State v. Britt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Defendant contends the trial court erred in excusing for cause certain prospective jurors who indicated they could not return a verdict of guilty knowing such verdict would necessitate imposition of a death sentence.
We note initially that in his brief defendant names no specific juror he contends was improperly challenged for cause. He apparently challenges the phraseology of the questions propounded by the district attorney to prospective jurors McCall and McDonald. The district attorney asked these and other jurors whether they were “opposed to it” (capital punishment) or…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.