Massachusetts Casualty Insurance v. Rief
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
The trial judge sitting without a jury found that the appellee, Merrell M. Rief, who was insured by the appellant, Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Company, was “totally disabled” under the policy, which defined that phrase as “inability to engage in any part of the duties of the Insured’s regular occupation.” The insurer appeals from a judgment for the sum of the accumulated monthly payments called for hy the policy and a declaration that the payments continue to be made each month until the end of the full period stipulated by the policy.
Rief’s regular occupation was that of an executive in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erreca v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Benefit Association of Ry. Employees v. SecrestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Clarke v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Doyle v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Niccoli v. Monarch Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1972
- Berkshire Life Insurance v. Maryland Insurance AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Ohrel v. Continental Cas. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Nystrom v. Massachusetts Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Radkowsky v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999