Nystrom v. Massachusetts Casualty Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
Earl and Peggy Nystrom appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Co. in their action for breach of contract and insurer bad faith based on six occupational disability insurance policies. Because we find the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law insufficient, we remand for further findings.
FACTS
For several years before January 1979, Earl Nystrom was employed by the Farnam Company of Phoenix, Arizona. Farnam is a distributor of horse care products. Nystrom’s duties with the company ranged from sales to marketing and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Weber v. Blue Cross of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1982
- Brown v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tornabene v. Bonine Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Gaveck v. Arizona State Board of Podiatry ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Radkowsky v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Edwards v. Arizona Department of Transportation/Motor Vehicle DivisionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Ceimo v. General American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.