Legal Opinion
Radkowsky v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 29, 1999No. 1 CA-CV 98-0480PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
¶ 1 Allen K. Radkowsky, M.D., maintains that he is disabled according to the terms of five disability and business overhead policies purchased from contract predecessors of two insurance companies, Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company and Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company of Philadelphia (collectively, “Provident”). After his claims were denied by Provident, he sued it for breach of contract and bad faith, requesting compensatory and punitive damages. After considering cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court granted judgment for Provident on the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Oglesby v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995
- Thomas v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Grand Real Estate, Inc. v. SirignanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barth v. Cochise CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- VICARI v. Lake Havasu CityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Berkshire Life Insurance v. Maryland Insurance AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Horton v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Cynthia Cheney v. US Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.