Legal Opinion
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Stmicroelectronics, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 29, 2014No. Case No. C-14-03236-RMWPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE
[Re Docket Nos. 37, 38]
RONALD M. WHYTE, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Cisco Systems Inc.’s (“Cisco”) first amended complaint (“FAC”) against defendant STMicroelectronics, Inc. (“ST Micro US”) alleges claims of negligence, negligent and intentional misrepresentations, and negligent and intentional interference with business relations. Dkt. No. 21 (FAC). Defendant filed a motion to dismiss (“MTD”) the FAC under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a), 9(b), and 12(b)(6) on the grounds that it…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- GemCap Lending, LLC v. Quarles & Brady, LLPDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Faulks v. Wells Fargo & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Overton v. Uber Techs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- O'Gara v. BinkleyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2019
- (PS) Murphy v. WitbeckDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.