Overton v. Uber Techs., Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Archie Overton and S. Patrick Mendel sue the California Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC") and CPUC Commissioners in their individual and official capacities (together, the "CPUC Defendants") for creating a licensing scheme for "Transportation Network Companies" (TNCs) which Plaintiffs allege is preempted by federal transportation law and violates their Fourteenth Amendment rights. Plaintiffs also sue Rasier-CA, LLC for "acting in concert with the Commissioners" to secure a TNC permit "to avoid and subvert" federal transportation laws.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Diva Limousine, Ltd. v. Uber Techs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- James v. Uber Technologies Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- eShipping LLC v. Focused Transport Solutions LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2024