Legal Opinion
Faulks v. Wells Fargo & Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 7, 2017No. Case No. 13-cv-02871-MEJPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, United States Magistrate Judge
INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo”) Motion for Summary Judgment. Mot., Dkt. No. 126. Plaintiff Laurence Faulks (“Plaintiff’) filed an Opposition (Dkt. No. 129) and Wells Fargo filed a Reply (Dkt. No. 134). The Court previously vacated the hearing on the Motion. Dkt. No. 135. Having considered the parties’ positions, the relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Wells Fargo’s Motion for the following reasons.
BACKGROUND
Unless…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hodges v. Hertz Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Former Emeryville Redevelopment Agency v. SwagelokDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Immigration and Customs EnforcementDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Mitchell v. Praetorian Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2024
- Muhammad I. Safdar v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.