Legal Opinion

United States v. McNeil

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2001No. 01-3187PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Neil A. NcNeil, proceeding pro se, appeals a district court judgment denying his motion to reduce his sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

In 1997, McNeil pleaded guilty to two counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d). The court sentenced McNeil to 121 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release. McNeil did not object, nor did…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Robert Lonberger, Jr. v. R.C. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. In Re Carl Green, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. McNeil v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. McNeil v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API