Legal Opinion
McNeil v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 23, 2004No. 02-4097PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Neil McNeil, a pro se federal prisoner, appeals a district court judgment denying his motion seeking to reopen his prior 28 U.S.C. § 2255 case under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
In 1997, McNeil pleaded guilty to two counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d). In exchange for his guilty plea, the government dismissed count one of the indictment. Pursuant to a written…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Glover v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Samuel Donald Hood II v. Samuel Donald HoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Domenico Mastini v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company and Western Electric Company, Domenico Mastini v. New York Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- McNeil v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Mercury Data Sys., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2018
- Christopher Foster v. Northeast Ohio Correctional CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- Daniels v. Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Franklin v. HaakDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Jermaine Maurice Franklin, Jr.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022