Legal Opinion

Sanders v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 29, 1963No. 202PublishedCited by 2,406 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

We consider here the standards which should guide a federal court in deciding whether to grant a hearing on a motion of á federal prisoner under 28 U. S. C. § 2255.1 *3Under that statute, a federal .prisoner who claims that his sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States may seek relief from the sentence by filing a motion in the sentencing court stating the facts supporting his claim. “[A] prompt hearing” on the motion is required “[u]nless the motion and the files *4and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief . . .…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,406 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

2,401 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API