Legal Opinion
In Re Carl Green, Movant
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 5, 1998No. 97-0417PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Carl Green moves the court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West 1997), for an order authorizing the district court to consider his third application for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The government has responded to the motion, stating that the motion should be denied because Green has not satisfied either criterion specified under § 2244.
In 1990, a jury convicted Green of possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and being a felon in possession of a firearm…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by36 opinions
- Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Richard Cooey v. Ralph Coyle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Melvin Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Renato Acosta, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- In Re John Paul MinarikCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.