McNeil v. United States
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ECONOMUS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon Petitioner’s pro se Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 To Vacate, Set Aside, Or Correct Sentence By A Person In Federal Custody (Dkt.# 1) filed on November 12, 1998 (hereinafter “Petitioner’s Motion”).
Also before the Court are the following: 1) a document filed by Petitioner on May 10, 1999 (Dkt.# 27) which has been docketed as a motion for default judgment, and 2) Petitioner’s Motion For Default Judgment (Dkt.# 31) filed on August 6, 1999.
For the reasons which .follow, the Court denies Petitioner’s Motion…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McNeil v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Rhodes v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006