Legal Opinion
Robert Lonberger, Jr. v. R.C. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 4, 1987No. 84-3596PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORNELIA G. KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Lonberger, petitioner in this habeas case, contends that his conviction in an Illinois court for attempted murder and aggravated battery violated the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment and that his guilty plea in the Illinois case was involuntary because his counsel failed to apprise him of the double jeopardy violation. Petitioner’s Illinois conviction for attempted murder was used in a subsequent Ohio proceeding as a specification to enhance his sentence for murder. The District Court denied the writ. We affirm, although on a somewhat different…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Mario Rosales-Garcia v. J.T. Holland, Warden, Reynero Arteaga Carballo v. Mark Luttrell, Warden Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Carlos Molina v. Richard H. Rison, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Alley v. BellDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2000
- Flood v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Mario Rosales-Garcia v. J.T. Holland, Warden, Reynero Arteaga Carballo v. Mark Luttrell, Warden Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.