Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Davis

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 1931No. Docket No. 7847PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued upon a written contract for advertising. The cause was tried by the court without a jury and judgment went for plaintiff as prayed. The defendant appeals upon typewritten transcripts.

On February 20, 1928, the parties executed a contract in writing under which plaintiff agreed to run thirty feet of advertising film six days a week alternating weekly between the Southern Pacific and Key Route waiting-rooms in the Ferry Building at San Francisco for the term of fifty-two weeks. The defendant agreed to pay therefor the sum of $30 a week payable monthly after the first exhibit,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dugan v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  2. W. R. Danforth & Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
  3. Davis v. BronsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Southworth v. RosendahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. William E. Peck & Co. v. Kansas City Metal Roofing & Corrugating Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Bomberger v. McKelveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Atkinson v. District Bond Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Early v. Santa Clara Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Rehart v. KlossnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API