Legal Opinion

Jeppi v. Brockman Holding Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1949No. L. A. 20674PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Frank Jeppi and W. B. Camp, Sr., are suing for damages assertedly sustained by them because of the refusal of Brockman Holding Company, Incorporated, and Mary C. Spalding, its president, to convey certain real property. A decision of the appeal from the judgment which followed an order granting a nonsuit turns upon the authority of Mrs. Spalding to bind the corporation.

The evidence presented by the appellants, stated most favorably to them may be summarized as follows: Brockman Holding Company, Incorporated, was organized in 1930 to manage and dispose of the estate of I. W. Brockman,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. District Bond Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Matter of Miglietta (2660 Broadway Corp.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Brainard v. De La MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Boggs v. Lakeport Agricultural Park Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Corporation of America v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Consolidated World Investments, Inc. v. Lido Preferred Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Hunt Foods, Inc., a Corporation v. Wellington Phillips and H. W. LiholmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. Marino v. ValentiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Larry C. Iverson, Inc. v. BoumaMontana Supreme Court · 1981

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API