Legal Opinion

Fred Bronner Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 28, 1966No. C.D. 2832PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olivee, Judge:

The parties in this case agreed to consolidate four protests for the purposes of trial, and the plaintiff herein narrowed its claim hi these protests to the items described on the entry papers as “Models of Yesteryear” or the “Yesteryear Series,” abandoning any claims with respect to other items appearing on the entries involved. The merchandise was assessed with duty at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 52739, as toys, not specially provided for. The claim presented to the court is for classification as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  2. S. S. Kresge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  3. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  4. Krummell Imports v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Wilson's Customs Clearance, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Novelty Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Inter Maritime Fwdg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API