Legal Opinion
Processed Plastic Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 6, 2005No. 00-00458PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RIDGWAY, Judge.
At issue in this action is the decision of the U.S. Customs Service (“Customs”) 1 denying the protest filed by plaintiff Pro cessed Plastic concerning the tariff classification of plastic children’s backpacks and beach bags that it imported from China.
The Government contends that Customs properly classified the backpacks and beach bags as “[t]ravel, sports and similar bags ... [ojther,” under subheading 4202.92.45 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) (1999), dutiable at the rate of 20% ad valorem. 2 See generally Defendant’s Brief in Support…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Otter Products, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Jedwards International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
- Otter Products, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Brown v. BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEMDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Firstrax v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.