Zurich Insurance Co. v. Rombough
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtT. M. Kavanagh, J.
Appellant seeks reversal of the decision of the Court of Appeals reversing the Clinton County Circuit Court’s declaratory judgment that Zurich Insurance Company was not obliged to defend its insured, Harry Rombough, in an automobile negligence action pending in Clinton County Circuit Court.
On September 9, 1965, one Richard Latz filed the above referenced automobile negligence action. Rombough was named as codefendant under Michigan’s “owner-liability” statute 2 on the basis of allegations that he owned the vehicle with which Latz’ car had collided and that said vehicle was being driven at the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- City Poultry & Egg Co. v. Hawkeye Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Duval v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Burton v. Travelers Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Zurich Insurance Co. v. RomboughMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
3Cited by75 opinions
- Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Detroit Edison Co. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Powers v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.