Legal Opinion

Burns v. Osborne-Fitzpatrick Finance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1929No. Docket No. 7108PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment for damages in this action for fraud and deceit practiced upon him by the defendants inducing him to buy twenty-five cemetery lots (called sections) for speculation at the price of $165 per lot. The measure of damages applied by the court was the difference in actual value of the property at the time this action was commenced and what it would have been worth at that time had the defendants’ false representations been true and had the fraudulent promises been performed. No question is raised as to the measure of damage applied and no question is or was made as to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnston v. PeairsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Trapasso v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Bank of America v. WillardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. People v. MoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Boral v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API