Legal Opinion

Fishman v. Silva

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 4, 1931No. Docket No. 7285PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

The above actions grew out of an automobile accident which occurred in San Mateo County. Inasmuch as both cases involved the same accident and the witnesses were the same in each, there was an order of consolidation in the court below. The cases were tried together and the appeals are presented through one bill of exceptions, under stipulation.

The accident referred to was a collision between the Ford car driven by defendant Silva and a Studebaker car driven by the defendant Harris. The plaintiffs were passengers in the Harris car. The cases were tried by the court, sitting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Rabe v. Western Union Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Carroll v. Central Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Tucker v. United RailroadsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Springer v. Pacific Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Zelayeta v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. State v. LingmanUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Linde v. EmmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API