Stephens v. Weyl-Zuckerman & Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action is for the balance due for the construction by plaintiffs of a gasoline launch under an ex press contract requiring the payment by defendant of the sum of $1,550 and providing that the launch should be completed on June 1, 1914. The boat was not ready on time but was accepted by defendant, which claimed, however, that it was entitled to a rebate or recoupment in consequence of the damage caused by the delay. It was, though, found by the court that there was a waiver of any such claim and the real controversy revolves around this consideration. The basis for the court’s conclusion…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Phillips & Colby Construction Co. v. SeymourSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Bryson v. McConeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Paddock v. StoutIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Stiewel v. LallySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- McLaughlin v. KnoblochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robberson Steel Co. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Orr v. FordeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Banducci v. Frank T. Hickey, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1949