Legal Opinion

Rieger v. Rich

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1958No. Civ. 22731PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

Plaintiffs, in their capacity as coexecutors of the estate of Maria Lamp, Deceased, instituted this action to set aside a certain deed executed July 11, 1955, by said decedent, as grantor, to defendants, the day preceding the grantor’s death.

By their complaint plaintiffs alleged fraud, undue influence, lack of capacity, and that the deed was procured by defendants without the payment of any consideration.

By their answer, defendants denied generally the allegations of the complaint, and as a third affirmative defense alleged ownership in the property in question by reason of an administratrix’…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Valencia v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Wilbur v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Carman v. AthearnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Barbara A. v. John G.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Nelson v. GauntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Jovine v. FHP, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Gross v. NeedhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Stenger v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API