Legal Opinion

Gross v. Needham

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 7, 1960No. Civ. 24405; Civ. 24451PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

The present matters, one a civil proceeding and the other in probate, were consolidated for trial at pretrial conference because of evidence common to both causes; separate judgments were rendered for plaintiff and petitioner, June Gross. Pursuant to stipulation, they have reached this court on a single reporter’s transcript and one set of briefs and will be disposed of in such consolidated form.

In each proceeding the same persons are the litigants. June Gross (born Gilligan) is the half sister of Danford C. Need-ham (hereinafter referred to as Dan). When Dan was a child, his father died and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Maltaman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Haskins v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Estate of ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Estate of EffronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API