Legal Opinion

Jovine v. FHP, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1998No. B105314PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

This is a case about due process of law. Plaintiff Leo Baumohl 1 appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of his employer, FHP, Inc. (FHP), and his supervisor, Charles Kiskaden (Kiskaden; collectively, defendants) after the trial court confirmed and adopted the decisions of a court-appointed referee on three motions for summary adjudication filed by the defendants.

Our review of the appellate record demonstrates that the trial court’s reference of such law and motion matters was not authorized by either statute or the consent of the parties and amounted to an improper…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. In Re HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Camp v. Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & MarmaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Elkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Mediterranean Constr. Co. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Sy First Family Ltd. Partnership v. CheungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. In re StierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API