Legal Opinion

Wilbur v. Wilbur

California Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1925No. Docket No. Sac. 3600PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Mrs. Hazel Wilbur, wife of codefendant Glen A. Wilbur, who was made a party to the suit, appeared and filed her answer in which she disclaimed all right, title, estate, and interest in and to the lands, premises, and personal property or thing involved in the action.

Plaintiff and appellant, Elmira J. Wilbur, is the mother of Glen A. Wilbur, defendant and respondent herein. The real property, the transfer of which it is claimed by the appellant was fraudulently made, as will later appear, and which is the basis of the action, was a part of a larger estate originally acquired by A. H. Wilbur,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Nobles v. HuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Soberanes v. SoberanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Millican v. MillicanTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  5. President, Etc., of Bowdoin College v. MerrittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gorman v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Lippert v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Zinn v. Fred R. Bright Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Crooks v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API