Stenger v. Anderson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
In this case we are called upon to construe for the first time certain statutes which seek to protect *972the health and welfare of aged persons in California when they enter into contractual relationships with those who would proffer life care in return for the receipt of property. We deal here with legislation designed to prevent the infliction cf harm to the elderly by those who are not fully qualified to care for them under proper conditions and on reasonable terms. Specifically, we must decide whether the laws regulating prepaid life care for the aged1 extend protection to persons who…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Latipac, Inc. v. Superior Court of Marin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Odell v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Richelle L. v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Keithley v. Civil Service BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. WhaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Yoo v. RobiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Saslow v. Andrew (In re Loretto Winery Ltd.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.