Legal Opinion
Bothell v. National Casualty Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1910No. 8715PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered September 30, 1909, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on a policy of accident insurance, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
On October 15, 1908, one A. J. Bothell made a written application to the appellant for a policy of accident insurance. Immediately preceding his signature to the appli*210cation, the following provisions are printed in the same type-as the remainder of the application:
“I understand and agree that, if I contract ilhiess or am injured fatally or otherwise after having changed my occupation to one classified by this company in their manual as-more hazardous than that herein stated, or if I am injured: while performing, temporarily or otherwise, any act pertaining to any more dangerous hazard or…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Staats v. Pioneer InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Hart v. Niagara Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Mesterman v. Home Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Otte v. Hartford Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Michigan Mutual Life Insurance v. LeonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arneberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Granville v. American Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Dolan v. Continental Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Dolan v. Continental Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Bryan v. Travelers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.