Legal Opinion

Dolan v. Continental Casualty Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to recover upon an accident insurance policy, which policy is too lengthy to be given in full. Certain provisions of the policy, necessary for a consideration of the case, are as follows:

"This policy provides indemnity for loss of life, limbs, sight or time caused by accidental injury and for loss of time caused by sickness — all to the extent herein provided.
"The Continental Casualty company incorporated by the state of Indiana as a stock company, old line plan. General office, Chicago, hereinafter called the company, hereby insures Mr. John M. Dolan (hereinafter called the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Scotland County v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Currie v. Waverly & New York Bay RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
  3. Dunbar v. Phenix Insurance Co. of BrooklynWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Triple Link Mutual Indemnity Ass'n v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. v. SnowdenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Comer v. World Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. DeJonge v. Mutual of EnumclawOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. SparrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. Comer v. World Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Comer v. World Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API