Hart v. Niagara Fire Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dunbar, C. J.
— This action was brought in the superior court of Pierce county by the plaintiffs to recover *621from the defendant, the Niagara Fire Insurance Company, the sum of $910, plaintiffs claiming that amount due them upon a policy of insurance issued by the defendant company to George E. Hart, and assigned by him to the co-partnership of Hart & Jewell, the property covered by the insurance being certain mill property situated near the city of Tacoma. The interest of the Pacific National Bank as plaintiff in the suit arises by virtue of the chattel…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ripley v. . the &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Goddard v. East Texas Fire InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Kausal v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Gans v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Commercial Insurance v. IvesIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Starr v. Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co. v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
- Murray v. MossmanWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Coles v. Jefferson Ins. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
- Sweaney & Smith Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.