Legal Opinion

People v. Hendrickson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1998No. 110397, Calendar No. 10PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

We granted leave in this case to determine (1) whether independent evidence of a beating was required before a 911 audiotape recording about the beating could be admitted under the present sense impression exception to the rule barring hearsay, and (2) whether photographic evidence depicting the victim’s injuries presented independent evidence of the beating.

We find that the photographs of the victim depicting injuries consistent with the allegations of assault provide independent evidence that the assault occurred. Therefore, we conclude that the recording of the victim’s statement that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. People v. BahodaMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. VasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. United States v. NarcisoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. ChelmickiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. People v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Ykimoff v. W a Foote Memorial HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. TorelliConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API