Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1993PublishedCited by 176 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Hancock, Jr., J.

In defendant’s trial on burglary and other charges, recordings of two 911 transmissions describing the events in progress were received in evidence against him. His appeal presents a question of first impression in our Court: whether such evidence may properly be admitted under the present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule. For reasons to be explained, we hold that the present sense impression exception is the law in this State and that it was properly applied by the courts below in holding the evidence admissible. Accordingly, the order should…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. MarksNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Loschiavo v. Port Auth. of New York & New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. KernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by176 opinions

  1. People v. VasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. KelloNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. People v. BuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. FratelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Nucci v. ProperNew York Court of Appeals · 2001

171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API