People v. Vasquez
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Titone, J.
In each of these three cases, the defendant unsuccessfully sought to introduce hearsay statements that were made in the course of 911 calls on the theory that those statements qualified for admission as "present sense impressions.” The appeals from the Appellate Division orders affirming defendants’ convictions require us to consider the precise contours of the criteria for present sense impressions that we outlined in People Brown (80 NY2d 729) and People v Buie (86 NY2d 501). Since these criteria were not satisfied by the offers of proof in the three cases…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. DawsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. MarksNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by242 opinions
- People v. CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. CottoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. RichardsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. BierenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
237 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.