Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2004No. Docket 122457PublishedCited by 173 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

In this appeal, defendant seeks reversal or remittitur of the largest recorded compensatory award for a single-plaintiff sexual harassment suit in the history of the United States. The $21 million verdict awarded, according to plaintiff, barely compensates her for the lasting effects of the sexual harassment she endured as an employee of defendant, DaimlerChrysler, by whom she is still employed and earning almost $100,000 a year. She contended during her trial that defendant’s failure to deal adequately with sexual harassment in her plant led to a permanent change in her “brain chemistry” and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. People v. BahodaMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by173 opinions

  1. People v. YostMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Dextrom v. Wexford CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Johanna Woodard v. University of Mich Medical CtrMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. People v. SteeleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API