Legal Opinion
Browning v. Dow
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 1923No. Civ. No. 2471PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The complaint alleges that the defendants are the trustees of Reclamation District No. 108, located in Colusa and Yolo Counties; that as such trustees they ceased, on the sixteenth day of July, 1915, to keep an office in or near the district and established the office of such district in San Francisco, where it is now maintained; that the town of Grimes is in or near the district, is a business center thereof, convenient to the residents of the district, and provided with suitable offices and accommodations for the transaction of the business of such district; and that San Francisco…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Ward v. Commissioners of Beaufort CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Jacobs v. Bd. of Supervisors of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Broaddus v. Essex County SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Knoff v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Grant v. MichaelsMontana Supreme Court · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.