Legal Opinion

Broaddus v. Essex County Supervisors

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 28, 1901PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Essex county, rendered October 9, 1900, on an application for a writ of mandamus, wherein the plaintiffs in error were the petitioners, and the defendant in error was the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

The plaintiffs in error filed their petition in the Circuit Court of Essex county against the Board of Supervisors of that county, *371praying for a writ of mandamus to compel them to erect a fireproof clerk’s office.

Section 925 of the Oode requires the hoard of supervisors of every county to provide a court-house, clerk’s office^ and jail, and section 926 provides that “every such clerk’s office shall he fireproof.”

The petition for the mandtanus avers that the hoard of supervisors have failed and refused to provide such an office, hut “on the contrary have left, and do now leave, the valuable…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thurston v. HudginsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Richlands Medical Ass'n v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  2. State ex. rel. Dakota Trust Co. v. StutsmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Browning v. DowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railway v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PeeblesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API